gemfyre: (Anti-smoking)
gemfyre ([personal profile] gemfyre) wrote2008-05-10 07:10 pm

I don't understand

Cross posted to [livejournal.com profile] anti_smoking.

From the Wiki article on snuff.

Oral snuff, in the form of dipping tobacco and snus is banned from all countries of the European Union, except Sweden and Norway, where the sale of snuff is legal.

WHY? That doesn't make any sense. Snuff affects no-one but the imbiber. Lit cigarettes/cigars/pipes/hookahs effect everyone in the vicinity, whether they want to be affected or not.

*bangs head on wall*

Why don't tobacco companies heavily market these smokeless alternatives? It would make everyone much happier. Those that don't want to inhale smoke wouldn't have reason to bitch all the time and worry about the health effects of passive smoking, and smokers/nicotine addicts could have their drug fix without bugging everyone around them and having to deal with the subsequent bitching.

[identity profile] gemfyre.livejournal.com 2008-05-10 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not the nicotine addict's health I'm worried about. If they want to give themselves cancer, they can knock themselves out. I however don't want to be exposed to their carcinogens.
alias_sqbr: A cartoon cat saying Ham! (ham!)

[personal profile] alias_sqbr 2008-05-12 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
Ah. In that context your comments make perfect sense :)